Feedback by UserVoice


My feedback

  1. 15,543 votes

    We're glad you're here

    Please sign in to leave feedback

    Signed in as (Sign out)
    You have left! (?) (thinking…)
    Anonymous supported this idea  · 
    An error occurred while saving the comment
    Anonymous commented  · 

    I am looking forward to this as well perhaps for a different reason. I do not have performance issues with the current 32-bit implementation. What concerns me is the number of supporting applications that are still 32-bit living on our 64-bit OS.
    I was shocked when I looked and saw that on a fresh start of my machine, I have 28 applications that are still 32-bit; OneDrive is just one of them. A number of support utilities for my system along with things like Google Updater, Intel software (IME) to name just a couple. While things appear to be stable. when I do launch larger 32-bit applications that require memory (I do have some older ones that are valuable), I have gotten out of memory errors and the apps subsequently crash. Obviously the error is somewhat erroneous given I have 16 GB and there's plenty of room left according to task manager. This is a masked issue due to the fact the way 32-bit apps work and that they can only access up to 3GB out 4 GB unless AWE mode is activated for the specific app and it knows how to make use of that feature..
    If I recall it took quite some time to get devs to move from 8/16 bit apps to 32 so I imagine this road shall be just as long.

Feedback and Knowledge Base